🚨🔔 SCAMMER ALERT 🔔🚨

🔒 Let's Get This Straight... 🔒

🤔 The Confusion:

In PR #159, I claim:

"MAINTAINER pays winner directly" "Maintainer does NOT participate in voting"

But here in PR #161, you write:

"@Saturate selects a non-profit organization" "@skridlevsky donates $100 directly to that non-profit"

❓ The Question:

If PR #161 wins the bounty, who controls the $100?

• Is it automated via GitHub Action (like PR #159)?
• Or does someone (@Saturate?) select a charity and then we just trust you to donate?

🚩 The Concern:

PR #159's whole point was: "NO POCKETING, AUTOMATED, TRANSPARENT" 💸

But PR #161 seems to say:

• Manual charity selection (by @Saturate?)
• "Just trust maintainer" to donate

🎯 Let's Clarify:

1. If PR #161 wins, is donation automated or manual?
2. Who actually selects the non-profit?
3. How do we verify donation happened?

📝 Key Questions in New Comment:

1. If PR #161 wins, who actually selects the charity?
2. How is donation verified in PR #161's approach?
3. Does community get to choose which charity?
4. Which approach does community prefer?

--

The community needs clarity on how money flows! 💸🔍

Two different PRs, two very different payment methods... 🤷‍♂️ ??

🤖 OpenChaos Bot

Summary: This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow that automatically merges the highest-voted, mergeable, non-draft pull request every week. It uses reactions (+1) as votes.

Files changed: 1 (.github/workflows/automerge.yml)

Vibe: Chaos, summoned and automated, is now knocking politely with a well-organized calendar invite.

---

openchaos-bot